Some correspondence is pleasant - a birthday card, a letter
from an old friend, a notice about a financial gift, the resolution to a
business complication. Other correspondence is not so nice - a bill, a notice
of legal action, a complaint, junk mail, or a request for a contribution. Both
positive and negative letters have been around for a very long time.
Ezra was not the recipient of a particular letter (Ezra
5:6-17), but he was the subject of that letter. The letter was written by
Tattenai, a governor and adversary of the Jews who were attempting to rebuild
the temple. Tattenai wrote his letter to Darius the king for the purpose of
stopping the temple construction.
Tattenai had composed his letter well. He made it sound like
an objective report designed to protect the king's interests. The letter
reported that Tattenai and his colleagues had gone to observe the temple
construction, which was proceeding successfully. It conveyed the idea that
these men were doing a service for the king. Not only did these men visit for
observational purposes, but they also made deliberate inquiries (which called
into question the legitimacy of the work). The men inquired about authorization
for the project and took down the names of the "conspirators."
The letter recorded the response of Ezra and his fellow
workers to this investigation, an answer which the letter tries to call into
question. Basically, the letter reported, "They told us Cyrus sent and authorized
them." The skepticism bleeds through the page. Tattenai made a bold and confident
request, of which he was "sure" of the answer. He asked the king to
make a search in the records to see if any such authorization had ever been
issued. He was certain this authorization was made up. Even if it had happened,
it was probably a casual verbal assent with nothing to back it up. Or if it had
perhaps been written down, surely no one would be able now to locate that
authorization. Whether it had really happened or not was immaterial if the work
could be stopped due to lack of clear documentation.
Much of the content of the letter records the interrogation
that took place, and it shows that God's people responded well. First, they
acknowledged their relationship with God before anything else. Instead of
providing or promoting their own individual names, they identified themselves
as "the servants of the God of
heaven and earth" (5:11). This project was not about them. It was
about God.
Second, they forthrightly acknowledged their weaknesses.
Instead of trying to protect their reputations or exalt their positions, they
described themselves humbly. They told the reason for the destruction and shame
that had led to the need to rebuild: "because
our fathers had provoked the God of heaven to wrath" (5:12). These men
held no pretext that they were anything great.
Third, they provided a simple yet complete answer to the
question about authorization. "In
the first year of Cyrus king of Babylon, King Cyrus issued a decree to rebuild
this house of God" (5:13). They shared the detail (5:14-15) that Cyrus
also provided the temple utensils and that he sent the people with the
provisions for the purpose of rebuilding. They confirmed that they were
following orders that had not yet been completed (5:16).
Having appropriately identified themselves, having humbly
declared their position, and having forthrightly detailed their authorization,
these men left the rest up to God. God worked it out so that Tattenai and his
friends got exactly what they requested. An official search was made of the
records, and a scroll was discovered that confirmed exactly what Ezra and the
elders had said (6:1-5).
Tattenai's attempt to stop the construction backfired, as he
was ordered to "leave this work on
the house of God alone" (6:7). Furthermore, he was to provide tax
contributions to support the full cost of the building (6:8) and of the
sacrifices to follow completion (6:9).
Threat and danger came in the form of a letter. The letter
could have been a catastrophe for God's people. The people responded well. They
didn't worry or fret. They didn't panic or become upset. They didn't lash out.
They responded with humility, calmness, simplicity, and trust. God honored
their response by confirming and blessing their work even more.
No comments:
Post a Comment
As you leave comments and feedback, please remember that this site is desiged to edify and encourage.