These two books on the same topic say much just by their
titles. Both titles indicate that Christian contentment is of tremendous value,
but that it is not universally or easily achieved. Both assessments are
correct. There is something appealing and beautiful about a truly contented
Christian, but unfortunately there are too few Christians who really fall into
that category.
Both authors were Puritan preachers in London during the
1600s. They both saw the need for preaching on this important quality of contentment.
Mr. Watson stated, "A gracious spirit is a contented spirit. The doctrine
of contentment is very superlative, and till we have learned this, we have not
learned to be Christians." Mr. Burroughs similarly declared, "To be
well skilled in the mystery of Christian contentment is the duty, glory, and
excellence of a Christian."
Some readers may be a little nervous about reading something
written so long ago. For the most part, those fears are unfounded. The writing
will seem a little awkward to someone accustomed to reading only modern
writing, but the stylistic differences are not significant enough to prevent
understanding or to mask the important message of these books. A few words are
unusual ("creature" is used repeatedly to mean creature comforts),
and the sentences tend to be long with multiple parts.
I understand that the style is typical of Puritan writing. One
of the most noticeable things to me is the tendency to be so thorough and
detailed that it may seem the authors are beating the topic to death. Some
sections and chapters do seem somewhat repetitious. The overall organization is
not so much an outline with everything arranged under a few major points, but
more an exhaustive list that moves from one topic to another. To be fair, I
believe both men originally wrote a series of sermons that were later put into
book form. I believe it is also a Puritan tendency to rely on parallels in
nature or life to illustrate a point. I did not always follow the connection or
feel that these illustrations were valid (designed by God to teach what the
author asserted). Despite these minor challenges, both books are well worth
reading.
Mr. Watson's book at times seems to include rabbit trails
that are not organic to the discussion, and I felt like it took him several
chapters to actually get to the meat of his topic. He defines contentment as "a
sweet temper of spirit, whereby a Christian carries himself in an equal poise
in every condition." He presents some pertinent questions to help clarify
what is okay and what is not okay regarding a believer's attitude in this area.
Contentment does not require one to blindly think nothing in life is
unpleasant, nor does it prevent him from talking to God about the
unpleasantness or trying to change the unpleasantness through lawful means. In
other words, contentment is not naivety or denial; it is a choice.
The author shares reasons for contentment. He shows why
contentment is attractive and why the lack of it is not. He includes a rather
lengthy section of excuses people give for why they can't be content based on
their circumstances of life. He then provides arguments against those excuses.
While the list may not address each person's excuse, the chapter does highlight
the necessity of looking beyond the circumstances to the blessings or
realizations of what God might be doing through an unpleasant situation. Watson
then describes the benefits and advantages that accompany contentment and the
disadvantages and pitfalls that result when it is absent. The author provides a
list of characteristics of contentment to serve as a self-evaluation, and
finally provides some counsel for how to develop contentment in one's life.
I found Mr. Burroughs's book to be more concisely organized
than that of Mr. Watson, and Mr. Burroughs also more effectively challenged my
heart and thinking. He defines contentment as "that sweet, inward, quiet,
gracious frame of spirit, which freely submits to and delights in God's wise
and fatherly disposal in every condition." He effectively expands on each
word and phrase of the definition to give a good understanding of what
contentment is. He discusses the mystery of contentment by pointing out the
paradoxes of things that don't make sense to the world, but that a Christian
comes to understand that allow him to be contented. He tells how Christ and the
Bible teach the concept of contentment. There is a section describing the
benefits and blessings of being content, and then a complementary chapter
describing the evils of murmuring and illustrating how unbecoming it is for a
Christian. Burroughs tells how people try to rationalize or excuse their lack
of contentment by making themselves the exception. He as well closes his book with
recommendations for how to attain contentment.
A very important aspect of contentment that both men appropriately
address is the relationship between contentment and the understanding of God's
providence. While submission to providence is not equivalent to contentment, it
is an important foundation. It seems that achieving contentment is dependent
upon ever-increasing understanding of God's providence as well as
ever-deepening levels of submission to whatever God ordains.
Because the topic of contentment is so important and also so elusive, I recommend reading both books. The concept is so foreign to Christians that the repetition and continued reminders will help to reinforce the message. If reading only one of the two, I suggest the book by Burroughs. His book is considerably longer than that of Watson, however, so someone who is not a dedicated reader may choose Watson's book for that reason.
"Not that I speak
from want, for I have learned to be content in whatever circumstances I am."
Philippians 4:11 (NASB)
No comments:
Post a Comment
As you leave comments and feedback, please remember that this site is desiged to edify and encourage.